Okay folks, I’ve been trying to avoid Sparky but somethings just aren’t meant to be.
First up is the comment he left here, which I’ve approved (minus the link to his site) to show that I’m not making this up.
My thoughts and prayers are with you too, Bob. Or at least they’re with your wife, for you I’m still hoping you shoot yourself in the foot – just a graze. (please smile at least, man)
Does Weer’d mean his wife is sick too? I may have seen that before but I forgot. Same goes for her. I am a believer and I believe that lots of prayers and good wishes do lots of good.
This “believer”, this husband and former Marine tries to pass off a wish for me to injure myself as a joke. Sorry Sparky, it isn’t funny — not at all. It really fits in with the meme “Why are anti-gun advocates so violent”.
And by the way, how many people think his well wishes are sincere or just another attempt to troll for blog hits, eh?
And exactly what I have done MikeB302000 to deserve such an injury? Sought to protect my rights, protect my family, protect my wife or enable her to protect herself ? Or do you think that someone who had 4 procedures in a month, is currently undergoing chemotherapy should be forced to fight hand to hand against anyone who wishes her harm?
It shows your true nature when you can not even sincerely wish well of my wife without showing what a hypocritical piece of trash you are.
Second is a blog post he did at his place regarding a 69 year old grandmother who defended herself from a violent thug.
This young man was wounded quite seriously. He could easily have been killed. What if his intentions were not to rape and murder but just to steal the microwave and slip back out the door? In that case, and I know we can’t know that and the lady was within her rights to defend herself, but if the kid wasn’t really a lethal threat, the response was excessive. Am I right?
Wouldn’t there be a middle-ground approach too? How about telling the burglar, “I’ve got a gun on you, turn around and get out.” I know that offends all you letter-of-the-law guys who fantasize about just this kind of opportunity, but putting aside all that macho nonsense for a minute, wouldn’t it have been better if granny had scared the kid away instead of shooting three times at center of mass?
Let’s take this putrid comment in sections, eh?
MikeB302000 seems to be saying that a person’s property doesn’t really belong to them if a criminal wants it. How is that reasonable or sensible?
but just to steal the microwave and slip back out the door?
Think about that….people shouldn’t interfere with criminals if all they wanted was property. Never mind that at 69; it might be the only way she had to cook or that she would have to chose between medicine and replacing property.
Hey Sparky, is there a list of property it is acceptable for a thug to steal (TVs, DVD players, etc) and a list of property (prescription medicines, family heirlooms, etc) that we can use violence to protect?
Nope, Criminal Enabler MikeB302000 doesn’t want people to stop thugs.
This young man was wounded quite seriously
Maybe if he didn’t want to be injured severely; he shouldn’t broken the law.
The homeowner isn’t a mind reader, she doesn’t know the thugs intentions.
FORT WORTH — The 78-year-old Meadowbrook woman grabbed a baseball bat after she awoke to the sound of a doorbell, then a bang and a crash as someone kicked in the front door of her home.
She testified Wednesday that the intruder took the bat away, jerked her arm behind her back, choked her, fondled her and forced her to watch while he masturbated.
This lady did everything that a criminal enabler like MikeB302000 would ask: she asked him to leave, she used a less than lethal tool in her defense — one which required her to get within arms reach of a younger, stronger male attacker — she cooperated.
And instead of taking her property, he wanted something else.
After Green suggested that Stewart change his life by reading the Bible, he began choking her. She said he ordered her to pull up her T-shirt so he could see her breasts, then unzipped his pants and fondled her while he masturbated.
“He choked me where I couldn’t breathe,” she testified. “I thought he was going to kill me.”
This is the type of person
MikeB302000 wants to give multiple chances to hurt, maim, molest or murder while denying people their right to defend themselves from thugs like this.
but if the kid wasn’t really a lethal threat, the response was excessive.
Folks this is what criminal enabling, anti-rights advocates want — senior citizens at the “mercy” of vicious thugs.
Doesn’t matter if the thug only wants to rape, humiliate, rob or debase people….it’s not a ‘lethal threat’ so shooting someone is ‘excessive’.
Think about what the folks like MikeB302000 want. They want you, I, our wives, our sons and daughters at the mercy of sick and twisted individuals like Stewart.
Next MikeB302000 consistently advocates for forgiveness and multiple chances for criminals while calling for single strike laws for gun owners.
Let’s take a look at the history of Stewart:
Because he had seven prior felony convictions, Stewart’s prison term had to be at least 25 years.
Not arrests but 7 prior felony convictions !
These aren’t my words, this are MikeB302000‘s words — all the while wishing harm on me — not serious harm, just a grazing wound.
I really wish this was an aberration for MikeB302000 and his fellow criminally enabling, anti-rights advocating gun control friends — but it isn’t. Neither is the type of crime in either story. Thugs will seek to prey on senior citizens; both for fiscal gain and their own warped goals.
I really wish stories like the one in Fort Worth were uncommon but they are not.
Hey Sparky, can you tell everyone just how a home owner is supposed to know which thug breaking in is JUST a THIEF and which is a RAPIST or MURDER? Or does the homeowner have to wait for the thug to start the rape/murder before defending themselves?
People like MikeB302000 want to deny people the right to defend themselves — note the outcome in the two different stories.
The Senior Citizen who had the firearm – unharmed.
The Senior Citizen who had a baseball — molested in her own home
It leaves no doubt in my mind which side MikeB302000 is on and it isn’t the side of the senior citizens looking to protect themselves.
Please join the discussion.
Edited to Add
all you letter-of-the-law guys who fantasize about just this kind of opportunity
By the way Sparky, when you owned firearms — legally, were you a “letter of the law” type who fantasized about shooting people?
Is there where you developed your extensive experience with fantasies or was did it develop when you broke the law to own firearms?
Recent Comments